Keep it coming by using the Windows Feedback app to share your problem reports and suggestions so we can get them to the right feature team. And we also heard a lot of feedback around the border around Action Center - which is now gone in this build and looks much nicer", says Gabe Aul, Windows guru.Īul also explains, "as always, thank you for using the preview builds and sending us your feedback. We’ve also added new Taskbar animations for actions like moving files, downloads, etc.
#NOIZIO 1.6 WINDOWS 10#
We heard a lot feedback around icons in Windows 10 and think these new ones are a bit more refined. For example – you will see some new icons (check out File Explorer) as well as many subtle changes to the UX. You’ll see that in this build which has a number of small improvements and more polish. As I mentioned with the last build, from here onward you are going to see a lot of tuning, tweaking, stabilizing, and polishing which means fewer big feature changes from build to build. "We have a new build for PCs releasing today to Windows Insiders in the Fast ring - Build 10130. Don't worry though, there are some new features in the build. The company is wisely putting the major focus on tightening up the experience instead of introducing new features. Today, Microsoft releases Windows 10 Insider Preview Build 10130. Since build 10122, I am totally convinced that not only will Windows 10 be ready by the summer, but it will be exceptional too. Not only were there many bugs, but some baffling design choices.Ī lot has changed since then. While I was confident Microsoft would pull it all together eventually, I was dubious that the company could meet its self-imposed summer deadline.
The argument is that a single court order is insufficient to put "legal responsibilities on the entire Internet." The judge is expected to come to a decision about whether CloudFlare can be held accountable for access to Grooveshark next week. District Court Judge Alison Nathan ruled that the court proceedings would continue to be sealed, something that EFF and legal firm Goodwin Procter oppose. The case was brought before a federal court in an emergency hearing this week. Copyright holders should not be allowed to blanket infrastructure companies with blocking requests, co-opting them into becoming private trademark and copyright police. Just because you are providing a service to a website doesn't mean you should be roped into policing it. As things stand at the moment, EFF explains, the court orders mean that "service providers of every kind" can be held responsible for taking down a site - including the likes of CloudFlare. It hopes that by bringing the matter out into the open, greater transparency will be encouraged. EFF feels this is unfair and that courts are handing out retraining orders that are too far-reaching. When Grooveshark was closed down, it was done so via a sealed court order. It re-opens the question of who is ultimately responsible for the content that appears on sites - those posting it, those hosting it, or any other company involved in the delivery? The move was prompted by the closure of Grooveshark, a music website run by one of CloudFlare's clients. The digital rights group is battling record labels which it says are forcing web firms into becoming the "copyright police". The latest fight sees the organization joining forces with web performance and security firm CloudFlare in tackling the site blocking activities of the record industry. The EFF (Electronic Freedom Foundation) has involved itself in lots of online battles - including the fightback against NSA surveillance, and the drive for net neutrality.
0 kommentar(er)
